The planet is on hold because of the recycling of outmoded paradigms in all areas. In many respects we are faced with a near crisis of survival as a planetary race.  But this is the end-game of an age, be certain. The lumbering lunatic caricature of the hapless hero with a thousand hang-ups is over: mark it well. Yet everyone knows that there is something grand about to happen!  There is a new human emerging, a new planetary civilization on the horizon.  We probe the elastic membrane of our racial imprints  for the adequate maps and metaphors, the comprehensive unifying vision of the way  beyond war, want, primitive competition, and the inevitability of death. But we reject partial solutions grasped at in the criteria vacuum conflict between religion, philosophy, science and new age hope.  Yet there is an almost unthinkable new world-view dawning that releases us into that new era beyond religion and  beyond the old new age.  The background for the new paradigm comes from archaeology, bio-genetics, anthropology and astronomy.

The Profound Contribution Of Zecharia Sitchin

We are profoundly indebted to the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin, for his archaeological synthesis which proves the transcultural gods (Sumerian:Annunaki; Egyptian:Neter;  Hebrew:Anakim, Nefilim, Elohim) the ancient civilizations insisted came here from space, created humans and gave us civilization, were flesh and blood humanoids from the last planet in our solar system (Nibiru, Planet X) who genetically engineered us as slave animals by splicing their genes with Homo Erectus genes and, eventually, accepted us as limited partners. That is the true "natural history of the gods" that Joseph Campbell failed. A half million pieces of archaeological proof is corroborated  by the evidence for Planet X/Nibiru as developed by  NASA,  JPL, the Naval Observatory and various astronomers. Its gravitational pull on Uranus and Neptune flags it in our solar system. The mitochondrial DNA "search for Eve" and anthropology's "out of Africa" data placing our genesis in Central Africa 250,000 years ago, as well as strong evidence from many field of study,  corroborate the ancient records.

Why should we accept this almost unthinkable history?  The traditional belief has been that the "gods" must have been imaginary because the deeds  (flight through the atmosphere and space, use of weapons akin to atomic bombs and star-war lasers, the ability to communicate over long distances, the ability to create humans) ascribed to them were utterly fantastic. That reasoning has been vaporized by our own current technological capabilities.  Reaching the point in our technological knowledge that allows us to understand genetic engineering, lasers, interplanetary rocketry, electronic communication, has furnished the keys to the integration of our past with our present encompassed in the concept of generic humanity, the critical factor for planetary unification. In this perspective, in every area, it becomes clear that almost every  previous philosophical, religious, metaphysical and scientific worldview, has been partially correct.

The two major paradigms, the Creationist world view and the Evolutionary model, which have molded Western culture have been subsumed, corrected and outmoded by this new meta-paradigm of human nature provided by the profound ramifications of the new archaeological perspective. Joseph Campbell's gods are unmasked.


The Politics Of Our Evolution

The politics of our unique racial history may be characterized as a rapid evolution from slave to serf, to saviors to self. We were literally invented for the Nefilim' pragmatic purposes as gold mining and agricultural slave animals, became their serfs and limited partners with kings as local go-between foremen after they almost wiped us out in the Flood.  Once they had phased off the planet and left us on our own, we began to look to charismatic saviors, political and eventually  "religious", to lead us in the same submissive way we had formerly looked to our Nefilim masters.  I feel fortunate to be living in and contributing to an age when we are emerging from racial adolescence.

We come alive in a laboratory, the mutant fusion of an alien race with slightly more advanced knowledge and science than ours is today, with an indigenous species with intelligence requiring genetic manipulation to bring it up to adequate for basic gold mining operations. We are slaves of these far superior masters, looking up, innocent, naked and history less, in awe at their power, knowledge, history and amazing activities. As we develop over time, more precociously than they perhaps anticipated, some of us, at least, are recognized for a growing potential, elevated in status and function, sometimes even taken as sexual partners. Occasionally the offspring of such a marriage, like the king, Gilgamesh, who knew his mother to be pure Nefilim and his father human, demanded the rights of the Nefilim. Gilgamesh literally demanded immortality on a purely legal basis as a demi-god, a half-god. Surplus of us are pushed into the outback and develop our own adaptive native cultures from scratch. The out-backers retain some of the old memories from the  masters' centers  and hand them down as venerable, important, "sacred".

And our own "religions", naive proto-scientific explanations of the awesome forces and mysteries of nature evolve over time, mix with the venerable traditions and legends. This "out-law" culture spreads over the globe carrying with it the ancient history of our beginnings and the watershed events (the Orinoco Indians knew the Flood story. The American Indian cultures had 42 versions of it) and the veneration of the Nefilim Goddess Mother,  Ninhursag, the Nefilim geneticist who literally made us.  Gradually over time the two traditions con-fuse. But the "in-law” culture, still in direct contact with the Nefilim, know the masters to be flesh and blood humanoids and definitely in control. Kings are put in charge  when the populations get large and the candidates for this foreman position are often very capable but aware of the danger  of mistakes.

The rules are simple: do exactly as you are told as a foreman or you die, maybe be lucky and just get exiled. The Sumerian word for worship meant "work for", serve. And, from the beginning that we did, including acting our servant parts in the palace serving the masters the coq au vin, the beer, the wines they loved, the fatted calf, the bull and grains. When our females became attractive to the Nefilim males and they began to collect harems of these desirable female slaves and beget children by them we became too much of a nuisance threat and the Nefilim attempted to wipe out all of us in the Flood and then rethought their decision. Having decided to keep us as valuable in rebuilding their centers after the devastating Flood, they taught us "crash courses" in civilization and technology as necessary for specific functions, farming, husbandry, textile production, food preparation, beer and wine production, mining,  construction, slave raiding, scribing, keeping the calendar, knowing how to tell when the home planet, Nibiru, would again  pass within the inner solar system and the Nefilim return. 

Breaking The Godspell

And then they phased off the colony planet. Pretty much just  left without closing the laboratory door, apparently beginning around 1250 B.C.. The foreman-kings are suddenly depicted  in the stone carvings standing where they used to stand when  listening to instructions from the master pointing to the master's now empty chair in utter dismay.  The laments are still  engraved in the clay tablets "What do I do when my master is no  longer here to instruct me....what shall I tell the people."  We  went into grief, despair, denial. We blamed ourselves and looked  to the sky for their return. The good kings did their best, the  leaders sometimes were told to go up the mountain to get some  instructions long distance from space or make a wooden box, lined  with metal just so, to act as a receiver. "Now hear this". Finally  we were alone and in confusion, beginning to  argue and  fight over who still  knew what the master really said, really meant, what we really should be doing if he did show up. Service at their table  transmuted into ritual sacrifice of food,  attendance at their  baths turned into bathing and clothing of surrogate statues of  them and gradually the routine services turned into cargo-cult  rituals and their palaces became empty temples. And the less  than good kings began to take advantage, began to swagger.  Sometimes they got away with it on their own.  Sometimes the  people, in desperation, raised their king to a symbolic god. And  the god-king and the seed of the notion of the divine right of  kings became.  And the chief servants went along with it because  it was to their advantage to become known as priests or to  preserve their jobs and status.  And those who had been taught,  seeing that the advanced knowledge of technologies and science  and the arts, learned as part of their function, of writing,  mathematics, astronomy, science, metallurgy, and the fine crafts in general was being lost set an agenda to preserve it. In the  face of misunderstanding and threat they disguised it, withdrew  it, hid it. And the "occult" became.

Eventually, the situation evolved to a very macabre stage.   In an effort to demonstrate our subservience and zeal to make  things right if they would just come back we kept the rules, we  maintained the routines of service but after a long time of  disappointment we reached a point of abject, abysmal desperation  where we would do anything to get them to come back -- and we  did. Remembering the  Nefilim males' attraction to our young  women, we began to cut their hearts out on top of the empty  pyramidal palaces in a collective craven pleading shriek to the  heavens from whence they had come and gone.  But that unspeakable  and unappreciated horror could not last: we began to doubt, to  entertain frightening cynicism, secret thoughts of independence  and why bother.

Slowly a classic disassociational process developed due to  separation in time and we began to sublimate the flesh and blood  Nefilim into cosmic absolutes and their personalities into mythic  archetypes.  Looking back over the history of our species the  traumatic transition we have gone through  might well be  characterized as the creation of the concept of a cosmic God by  us, through a series of psychological mutational phases. Eventually, we simply began to forget.

The transition from racial amnesia to racial maturity has  been a very traumatic passage.  Breaking the godspell has seen us  go through the stages of abandonment to disassociation, to  sublimation to religion to rebellion and now to recovery.  It is  the classic syndrome of the dysfunctional family on a planetary  scale.

Are we not haughty Egyptians, to whom the sky gods were everything, our rulers weakening and abandoned, now fearing that  we had done something very wrong, searching the stars for some  sign of their awesome craft? Are we not Hebrews, the chosen of  our Nefilim master, Yahweh, preservers and transmitters of the advanced technological knowledge entrusted to us, becoming  dismayed that the static is getting so bad that the words of the  retreating Yahweh from the Ark loudspeaker can hardly be distinguished and Moses, the last to see him face to face is  aging and even the nabi, the seers, argue about what he said?   Are we not Innana's women of Mohenjo-Daro, for long sure of our  dignity and  her patronage, suddenly abandoned by our goddess  queen? Are we not enlightened and democratic Greek citizens,  logical people who could hardly accept the impossible deeds of  the now remote gods as anything but uncertain fantasies? Are we  not Romans, sophisticated and urbane, masters of our destiny and  the known world, would we give anything but lip service to the  ancient deities now almost abstractions on our walls? Are we not  Medieval Christian theologians already abstracting and  sublimating the ruthless, peevish, jealous humanoid Nefilim  Yahweh into an infinite, omnipotent, omniscient, cosmic being  beyond our capabilities of thought who holds the universe in  being just by thinking about it? Where was toil and danger? Down  there slaving in the hot gold mines. And hell became.  Where is  the god and the good things that come from the god? Up there in  the sky.  And heaven became. Are we not the young Catholic priest  telling his docile parishioners not to read the Old Testament and  leave the interpretation of Scripture to the clergy trying  privately in anguish to reconcile history with his faith? Are we  not the fundamentalist bible school teacher watching herself mold  the minds of children to a tradition of unquestioned docility to  a God, her own doubts about whom she dare not allow herself to  think?

Down to our day, incredibly, we have remained still  Babel-factored for good crowd control, broken into tribes each  proprietarily telling the other that ours is the only accurate  tradition of what the god intended, what rules to follow, what we  should be doing to demonstrate we are still loyal and docile  servants. Sometimes we just kill each other over it. And  persecutions, Crusades, Jihads, Inquisitions, evil empires, the  saved and the damned, the martyr, the infidel, the saint, the  protestant, the fundamentalist, the atheist, became.

A very serious question is: Do other planets in other  galaxies have the same overarching phenomenon of alien humanoid  masters/creators-> gods-> god-over-gods-> God-> GOD-> CREATOR OF  UNIVERSES transformational sequence in their history because they  were genetically engineered also? The convolution, sublimation,  reverse anthropomorphizing (anyone have a better term for that?  maybe anthropodeification?) intellectualizing, abstraction, that  the notion of deity has gone through over the last 3000 years is,  to be wryly positive about it, a tribute to human genius... 

On The Brink Of The New Paradigm

Where do we stand now in the transition?

One of the most intriguing indicators of where we are in the  process of this coming out of the coma of racial amnesia to  racial maturity is the current state of archaeology.  Archaeology  is on hold and in a state of quiet but desperate crisis. Robert  Dunnell, a respected veteran archaeologist, said in an article in  the January issue of Archaeology magazine entitled Hope for An  Endangered Science,  in 1989, "....intellectually, archaeology is  in deep trouble, trouble that has been brewing for more than a  century and has now reached crisis proportions". Most  archaeologists would rather just dig and report and ignore the  problems. Even those who are inclined to deal with the critical  issues raised by the rapidly accumulating evidence for a new  interpretation of the history of our species unfortunately tend  to preclude even the possibility of the Nefilim presence. They  instinctively realize that any retreat from the  fundamental  postulate that gods were myth, imaginary, unreal figments of  naive human minds means revolution. For any serious scholar to  even broach the possibility of "alien intervention" the price is  most often peer persecution and even the ruin of one's career.

A reciprocal process has always been involved in our  torturous coming to racial genetic enlightenment:  the more we  learn the freer and more confident we feel to learn and accept  more, to shed the totems and taboos of the ancient godspell. At  this point in time we quite clearly are reaching the point of  radical paradigm shift. When we get this close to a paradigm  shift changeover point everybody can feel it coming in their  bones, in their genes, can almost taste it even though they may  not be able to articulate it.  So the predictions and the guesses  and the prognostications about what the new paradigm really is  are rife and various.

Some say, variously,  the major changes will be focused  around the shift into the precessional age of Aquarius; the  paradigm shift is already on us and it means that the  "vibrational level" of the entire planet will increase to a  higher frequency generating a higher human consciousness; the  actual crystalline form of the earth is shifting to a more  complex form; the magnetic field of the earth is diminishing and  magnetic pole reversals will trigger it;  it will happen finally  when aliens land and go public and, hopefully, offer us the  solutions to all our problems; it’s coming will be a monumental  intellectual one as we decode the prophecies of the ancients;  we will shift from the modern interpretation of the ancient world  to a recognition of the identity, nature and advancement of the  ancient civilization  that gave rise to Sumer, Egypt, India, the  Mayan empire and other western ancient empires.

Terrence Mc Kenna, having programmed the cycles of the I  Ching into the computer (Time Wave Zero) can see a startling slide into novelty  coming rapidly as we approach the year 2012 and sometimes says  the paradigm shift  will be a transcendental dimensional shift,  that the world as we know it will end  and sometimes that he is  not really sure.  He, in one sense, is using the I Ching as a  doomsday machine.

Some, like Marilyn Ferguson (The Aquarian Conspiracy), say that the big change is  manifesting in a rising groundswell to a new level of human  benevolence, kindness and love leading to a planetary order of  peace.  Some say that the paradigm shift will be more political,  the manifestation of a new world order leading to harmony and  peace.

It takes little reflection to notice that the primary  characteristic that dominates all these interpretations of these  prophetic perceptions may be called, generically, a profound  racial consciousness expansion.  I suggest that what we are  witnessing and experiencing, in the largest perspective, is  nothing less than the dawning of a planetary, racial, genetic  enlightenment, that these gods, we and our children, wear  designer genes, that we can and should claim our planetary  birthright, restore our true collective history in the final  dispelling of the haze of racial amnesia.  We can integrate our  indigenous heritage and become one with the earth again at the  same time as we integrate our off planet heritage and move off  into space.

As we step out of racial adolescence, struggling  through  the awkward but inevitable separation from the parent-gods, now  aware that our  mythology is our  greatest myth, we will realize  that the myriad predictions, prophecies and pop-eyed  pronouncements of turmoil, danger and glory are substantially  correct projections of the difficulties involved. The glimpses of  glory are intuitive projections of the facets of the character  and personality of the new planetary human and the new  civilization already brimming over the horizon.  The key to  graceful passage is an unassailable integrity, both racial and  personal,  springing from the genetic enlightenment that erases  the painful scar of the subservient, godspell slave brand from  our personal genetic web. We need, respectfully but firmly, to finally wash the ancient dyes of subjection now sublimated to a  focus on a pitifully anthropomorphic projection in the sky from  the tapestries of our cultures. 

Is This Atheism?

Is this atheism? No.  It simply is a long overdue correction  of some local solar system politics, relatively rather pedestrian  in cosmic perspective. Garden variety atheism can now be  understood as an early sign of racial adolescent rebellion and  questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid  characteristics of the particular local  Nefilim "god" of the  Hebrew tribe and Christianity, Yahweh, who was, by his own  admission, jealous (I am the Lord, your god, and you shall not go  over the border and work for my brothers and cousins...) and  clearly male chauvinist and disposed to violence in dealing with  his human slaves if the high-tech tricks of magic and high  wattage loudspeakers to which he resorted to intimidate them  didn't work.  The new paradigm, once the godspell is dispelled,  simply frees us to go one on one with the universe and to seek  directly whatever unthinkable or thinkable ultimate principle is  behind it. 

The Acceleration Of The  Traumatic Transition

It is well to be able to view the development of the new  paradigm in historical perspective.  By the turn of our century,  scholars had  become aware of the world-wide similarity of the  traditions of remote antiquity in all regions of the earth  dealing with the gods and their deeds. It had become  incontrovertibly clear that the basic themes and motifs of human  mythology were universal and even the genealogies of the gods  were the same the world over. Not only were the religions of the  world similar but it had also been established that much of the  teaching and traditions and history of the relatively recent  Hebrew religion,  considered by its adherents and the offshoot  Christian religion  to have been revealed directly to the  prophets and writers of the Old Testament, actually had been  derived from the much earlier and more developed cultures of the  Middle East as far back as the Sumerian civilization. The Old  Testament suddenly had to be  viewed as a relatively recent Reader's  Digest type synopsis of the detailed history of the race as known  and recorded by the Sumerians, Babylonians, Hittites, Akkadians,  Egyptians and other cultures. These discoveries were a tremendous  revelation yet deeply  puzzling and disconcerting.

In addition to these discoveries there had also been major  developments in the field of Psychology which were attractive to  those studying myth.  Freud, Jung, Adler and others had explored  the realm of mythology and religion in terms of the human  subconscious and had evolved psychological explanations for many  of the symbols and themes that were dominant in mythology.  This  set the stage for an explanation of all of mythology and  religion, from primitive or ancient to present, in psychological,  psychoanalytic and even psychopathological terms. 

The Jaynes-Campbell Syndrome

Faced with the significance of this explosive revelation and  ferment, the Jesuit trained Joseph Campbell (The Masks Of God )  set out to bring this  vast information from many disciplines together to write a  "natural history of the gods".  He conceived of such a work as   both a systematic identification and  classification as well as  the discovery of an evolution of the "visionary world of the  gods" that might well exhibit scientific laws, indeed as the  beginning of a "science of the roots of revelation".  It might be  termed a sociobiology of revelation.  But, never reaching a point  where he could acknowledge the "gods" real,  as actual history,  he could only hold that their source had to lie in the psychology  of the minds of men, even going so far as to say that there was  madness in the claims of the god-kings of Egypt. Seeing no other  alternative, he could only recommend a constructive exaltation of  what he considered the "mythological" portion of man's nature.  Campbell's ultimate goal was to develop an encyclopedic   "creative mythology" according to what he understood to be the  "laws and hypotheses of the science of the unconscious".  In  effect he was trying to make sense out of a historical phenomenon  which was full of deep contradictions and mind boggling facts and  seeming madness by psychoanalyzing the mess.  In doing so he had  to accept the Darwinian concept of evolution from less complex  forms to the more complex.

In a very real way, Campbell's  conclusions involved him in a self-contradiction:  at the very  beginning of his work, in the first volume,  Primitive Mythology,  he asked the question, Was the source of the knowledge of the   gods and the similar archetypes encountered all over the world to  be found in the local projections of deity and personality on the  awesome forces of nature, lightning, thunder, great storms, the  wind, sun, etc. by the naive human mind of our early ancestors?   Amazingly he answered, although local quaint myth may have had  its origin in that way, it was a diffusion of the stunning,  sudden high culture from the "little Sumerian mud garden" that  was the source of "the whole cultural syndrome that has since  constituted the germinal unit of all of the high civilizations of  the world" If even the details of the genealogies of the "gods"  were the same the world over it must have been a process of  diffusion rather than local development. He went as far as to  identify Sumeria as the primary mythogenic zone, a source of the  origination of the universal mythic themes.  But having reached  that startlingly acute insight, he nevertheless had to go on the  explain the gods as mythic archetypes in psychological terms --  how else can you explain something that you are convinced is  unreal?

Julian Jaynes, a Princeton psychologist well versed in  ancient history and literature, in The Origin of Consciousness In  The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, claims that, since all men  previous to 1250 B.C. claimed to hear, see, communicate with,  receive written information from and speak to  the gods (the  unquestioned assumption being that the gods were fictions) then  all men previous to that time must have been hallucinating  schizophrenes. Really. Read it for yourself. Impeccable logic,  wrong premise.   The Jaynes-Campbell syndrome, the most extreme explanation  one can advance if one starts from the unquestioned assumption  that the gods must have been unreal, marks the last step before  the resolution afforded by  Sitchin's thesis which puts the last  pieces of the puzzle of our history in place.

Forbidding Archaeology

Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson, devotees of a Vedanta  teacher who suggested they do the research, have compiled a  massive volume, Forbidden Archaeology, which documents numerous  finds that would place anatomically modern humans millions of  years previous to the 250,000 year time frame we are looking at  for our genetic creation by the Nefilim.  The Vedanta tradition  speaks of humans in the remote past contemporary with primitive  human and ape species.  The focus of their evidence is on  conclusively demonstrating that the theory of Darwinian evolution  that requires the more complex to arise from the less complex is  false as have other authors.  In this vein, they also document  the evidence for the very strong possibility that primitive human  species are still living on this planet in various remote parts  of the world and present evidence of high-tech items found in  very ancient strata. Their work is evenhanded and thorough and  they acknowledge their sincere, long range intent is obviously to  ultimately demonstrate the historical validity of the Vedanta  worldview in a second book.

I have carefully studied the evidence they present looking  for any incontrovertible evidence that would contradict Sitchin's  thesis and have found none.

The existence of advanced human civilization in the remote  past that was wiped out or degenerated for whatever reason, even  many times, would not contradict Sitchin's thesis.  If the  situation, at the point when the Nefilim arrived here and  eventually needed a slave creature, was such that  the most  advanced human types were of sufficiently low caliber to need  upgrading even to do mining as the records indicate, there is no  contradiction. The Nefilim selected a humanoid type  with which to fuse their genetic code or part of it, enough to  raise the humanoid species to a level of intelligent competence  to work as gold miners.  Sitchin has indicated that the humanoid  type chosen was Homo Erectus. Even if there were more advanced,  physiologically identical human types contemporary with  Homo Erectus 250,000 years ago, it does not, by that fact,  contradict Sitchin's thesis.  It does raise a question as to  whether the Nefilim might have actually used a more advanced  human type much closer to us to merge their genes with rather  than Homo Erectus.

Another theoretical possibility is also prompted:  even  though there might have been anatomically modern human types  available, the Nefilim could have chosen a lesser species, say  Homo Erectus, as a base on which to create a slave animal for  ethical or pragmatic reasons.  (We were described as eating the  grass of the fields and drinking from the ditch when we were  first invented.)  But, again, this does not seem logical on the  basis of why bother if a more advanced but not up to standard  type was available. And, in the last analysis, the records say  nothing whatsoever about any human type then that would have been  equal to us now.

Another question suggested by Cremo’s and Thompson’s work is  If there were anatomically  modern humans already existing on Earth, identical to us both  physiologically and mentally, even to the point of being self-aware as we identify ourselves to be, when the Nefilim are said  to have created us, could that mean that some contemporary humans  are from purely indigenous stock and some are from the  Nefilim/humanoid cross?  It is at least conceivable but logically  not probable:  why would the Nefilim even bother if there was a  species already up to standards that they could enslave -- or  hire?

For whatever reason, Cremo and Thompson have chosen to  ignore Sitchin's work completely in Forbidden Archaeology; there  is no reference either in the Bibliography or the Index.  I think  that this is significant if only that the exhaustive 900 page  work purports to be a thorough coverage of the available material  and the implication is that Sitchin's work is precluded as not  worthy even of note.  In another, explicitly Vedantic context (Alien Identities),  Thompson mentions Sitchin's work but I can find no instance where  he  associates the Vedantic gods in their vimanas, aircraft, with  the Nefilim. It is worth noting, however, that since the Nefilim  were in the area known as modern India,  the Vedanta tradition is  simply talking of them under a local name. Perhaps a major  contribution of the Vedanta tradition may eventually come from  its preservation of a very detailed account of the history of the  indigenous human types previous to the Nefilim genetic  intervention..  

Sitchin As Hot Potato

It is one thing  for Sitchin to say that it is clear that  the  Annunaki/Anakim/Neter/Nefilim were the ones who could and  did set up a  base on Mars and on Earth, built the Giza Pyramid  as part of their  second navigational landing grid, set up all  the ancient high civilizations, but it is obviously difficult  for  others involved in specific parts of the quest to  acknowledge it.

The corroboration of the evidence for the existence of the  Planet Nibiru by Harrington,  late head of the Naval Observatory,  and his willingness to recognize the accuracy of Sitchin's work  is startlingly impressive.

It is  interesting that Tom Van  Flandern, formerly of the Naval Observatory, colleague of  Harrington and searcher for Planet X/Nibiru denies the validity  of the translated information that Nibiru was originally captured  into our solar system and eventually collided with a large planet  in orbit where the asteroid belt is now forming Earth and the  asteroid belt  (Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets). He rejects that information on the basis of his own investigations which prompt him to  claim that a planet in  that orbit exploded forming the asteroid belt.  When asked how a  planet could explode he falls back on a hypothesis that has been  tossed about for some time and which is highly theoretical to say  the least. Nevertheless he would agree that there is a very high  probability that X/Nibiru is in our solar system.  He rejects the  evidence on the cylinder seal VA/243 in the East German Museum  that appears to quite clearly show our sun surrounded by various  size disks correctly representing all the planets in our solar  system including the tenth planet, Nibiru. His reason for  rejection: he has measured the diameters of all the disks and  found some slight discrepancies in the diameters of some.  Which  means to a scale ratio of something like 1.6 billion to 1 on a  4500 year old carved stone cylinder seal... Even the most  advanced computerized precision machining does not normally  produce that kind of accuracy especially in stone. It is  interesting to see how different personal orientations to the  same topic will cause two associated experts to radically  disagree.

Van Flandern has been  courageous to even consider Sitchin's material in his writings.  But, when one steps back for the sake of getting out of the line  of fire and to get the big picture, what is becoming very clear  recently is that this is not new age politics anymore, anyone  notice?  It appears all too much like academic and  scientific politics and ego chest bumping.

The ultimate question that all these investigators are being  forced to confront is simple: Who and what was the s that are evident to us but which some claim cannot be  identified? It has boiled down to four answers:
1> An advanced human civilization existed, perhaps even preceded  by other human civilizations that have peaked and waned in the  remote passed, developed high technology and culture, left enough  around to jump start humans  somehow coming after this first  civilization was wiped out or vanished.  No credible explanation  has ever been given as to who and what they were.  Well, maybe  Atlantis is a clue.
2> An advanced human civilization existed, developed high  technology and culture, left enough around to jump start humans  coming somehow after this first civilization fragmented, was  partly wiped out, some going to Mars and to the stars, groups  with different agendas in conflict, manipulating us, like a  dysfunctional family.  Well, maybe Atlantis is a clue.
3> A race or races of alien visitors from other stellar systems  has been intervening and altering humanoid development over long  periods of time and has left a deposit of basic knowledge to jump  start humans civilizations.
4> Sitchin's thesis. And I have not seen anyone refute Sitchin's basic  thesis yet.

He  never, to my knowledge, tries to discredit anyone's credentials  or reputation.  He will debate, disagree, reject but he will not  denigrate or attack someone's character. It's obvious that he is  too much of a hot potato for any of the other explanations.  He  is standing there with seven volumes worth of deep information  about who and what all the ancient first human civilizations said  unanimously who that previous advanced civilization was from  which they received the training in technology, learning, culture  and science, where they came from, what they did, where they  went. Once one gets to that question and answers it  "Annunaki/Nefilim", the game is over. Not only is it having to  accept someone else's thesis and recognize that yours is subsumed  by it but, once over the line, the paradigm shift required by the  ramifications is so profound that the difficulty of acceptance is  compounded by magnitudes.

Notice the percentage of Ph.D's, who are suddenly showing up in the forum?  Where've they been?   Waiting for the right peer signals, a shrug from their Dean,  approval by the agenda makers, a request from their publisher? You have to know that, if the Ph.D's, present heroic company  obviously excepted, are entering the discussion, it has already been over for years  and the lodge has voted to send a  delegation of experts to make definitive pronouncements about  what they'll claim they knew all along and to declare the new  topic as "science".  But the process of coming around is  torturous, so painful to even watch. And don't go too fast,  don't embarrass or get ahead of the rest.

And, over and above the American side conflicts, there still  is the powerful force of the official Egyptian "archaeological"  department with its own agenda, jealous of its own tradition and  religious ethos.  And you know that Saddam Hussein  is not going to stop parking his jets in the shadow of the  Ziggurats to protect them as he did in the gulf War or  reconstructing Babylon and other centers as  symbols of  proprietorship of our ancient heritage.

There is fundamental corroboration between Sitchin's  paradigm and the evidence on Mars, the dating of the Sphinx and  the Giza pyramid, the astronomical siting data of the great  Pyramid and the topological geometry embedded therein, the  astronomical evidence for X/Nibiru, the history of the gods in the Asian sector, etc.  The new paradigm  subsumes and completes those various pieces of discovery.  I know personally many of these pioneering and, in the face of opposition and ridicule from the establishment, courageous thinkers and scientists,  and find them, individually, to be persons of sincere conviction.  It is sad that any less than the professional ideal prevails. Consider what it would be like if all these pioneering  researchers were communicating and cooperating and working toward  a common goal rather than acting like pharmaceutical researchers  trying to beat each other to market with a new drug. 

Growing Pains At The Leading Edge

The new paradigm requires that we do no less than rethink  our entire racial world-view.  Breaking The Godspell was my first  contribution toward that end, focusing on the ramifications for  religion, philosophy and science. As we move to more and more  specific areas of reevaluation in this process, there is a topic that I believe needs immediate attention.

It is fascinating that the new age Goddess movement exhibits  resistance to Sitchin's thesis. Well known authors and  academicians representing this focus  are Merlin Stone (When God  Was a Woman), Maria Gimbutas (many articles: Journal Of Indo-European Studies), and   Riane Eisler (The Chalice and the Blade) among others.  Their  interpretations and opinions of the archaeological and historical  data carry a great deal of weight because of their depth of  research and scholarly approach.  The reason for the  attractiveness of their thesis is that it throws into perspective  the neglected, even denied,  status and  role of women in history  and points to a time in the past when, it is interpreted, there  was equality of the sexes and peace among humans, looked to  as a  model for our time and our future.  Many in the Goddess movement  view the new paradigm with suspicion because they feel that it  diminishes what Maria Gimbutas has interpreted as the “supernatural" element in the worship of the Goddess. But, on the  basis of the truth, whatever it turns out to be, sets you truly  free, I suggest closer study shows that the two paradigms  mutually reinforce and the new paradigm ultimately affords an  even more profound meaning to the Goddess concept.

A critical question to be addressed in this regard is  whether there is hard evidence for what is interpreted as a cult  of the female previous to our genetic genesis 250,000-300,000  years ago. Maria Gimbutas held that, so far, we can't see  evidence for the goddess cult much more than perhaps 25,000 years  ago -- although she "guessed" that it might go back as far as the  consensual date of the beginning of the Paleolithic era some  500,000 years ago.  I see no contradiction in any form of the new  paradigm by the evidence so far adduced in that regard.

The new paradigm provides an overarching context in which to  attain a much more accurate explanation of several  major  features that are involved in the Goddess religion theory:  the  mythological interpretation of the evidence; the interpretation  of the evidence as indication of a supernatural religion; the  lumping of all particular goddesses into a single amorphous  Goddess; the interpretation of the cause of the apparent "golden  age" of peace among humans; the nature of the catastrophic  revolution that altered the social structure to male dominant.

Breaking the Goddessspell

Because the consensus of the scholars studying the Goddess  phenomenon hold to the evolutionary context, it is easy and  natural to project a mythological character on the Goddess in her  various forms since the implicit assumption is that the earlier  we find humans in history the more naive and primitive they would  be and therefore all the more inclined to mythologize.  And, by  extension of this interpretation of the Goddess phenomenon as  mythological, it becomes easy to conceive of the goddess  phenomenon as a single continuum of gradual development centered  on just one Goddess, from  the earliest crude Paleolithic  figurines through the millennia to the very detailed images of  specific goddesses in the middle east and Crete.  An end result  of these interpretations as mythic projection of the primitive,  naive human psyche in an historical continuum is that the  individual goddesses recognized over the millennia as distinct  beings, often in very different contexts and times, often with  very idiosyncratic differences between them, sometimes as  different spouses of different male "gods",  are freely and  generally taken as simply different cultural names or aspects of  the Goddess interpreted as an archetype. Ultimately,  the result is that the goddess movement tends to get stuck in the  Campbell half of the Jaynes-Campbell syndrome.

I believe that we can already see sufficient evidential  correlation to say confidently that the basis of the goddess  mother cult in the earliest times  was a recognition and  veneration of the Nefilim female geneticist, Ninhursag, who  literally created us in the laboratory.  Both the "in-law" and  the "out-law" cultures would remember her equally.  Gradually,  over the millennia, as we became either the subjects of or at  least very aware of the various Nefilim females of higher and  lower social and functional rank, they also were venerated on a  more local basis.  Inanna, who as a member of the administrative  council of twelve which oversaw the entire planet and a pilot and  far ranging traveler, was very widely known to humans.

A problem lies in the fact that  taking the gods as myth has  allowed the various female Nefilim with their disparate personal  characteristics and foibles to be lumped together as the  amorphous Goddess archetype, an innocent but significant  error.  The recognition of the Nefilim as real allows us to see that  those "goddesses" were actually individuals of an advanced  culture and why, though they were humanoid, humans saw them as  superior or at least in a position of superior authority.  Some  were highly respected and loved by humans, others less so.  Some  were of very high rank and authority, some were lower echelon  technicians, specialists and officials.  But they were Nefilim  and thereby set apart from humans.  Because of this amorphous  melding into the goddess archetype, the less than ideally  feminine characteristics of some of the Nefilim women tend to be  glossed over.  A single example is that of Innana's dealings with  human men whom she had killed when they refused to become her  lovers.  Her political ambitions caused her to manipulate in such  ruthless ways that current slang would term her a "bitch on  wheels".  Yet she is also the one who probably gave us tantra  yoga and the ideal of the fully independent, self-realized woman. Understanding the veneration of our Nefilim female rulers as  both compulsory and conditioned by the relative attractiveness  and benevolence of their individual personalities throws light on  two other facets of human existence when the Nefilim were here on  the planet.

The new paradigm provides a context in which to resolve a  disagreement within the goddess studies movement itself. One school of thought, following Gimbutas, holds that the   hazy "golden age" when there was generally peace and little  tendency toward social and sexual conflict was due to a  matriarchal orientation:  women were dominant. Others,  following Eisler,  would hold that this fortunate state should  be  attributed to a partnership of equality between male and female.  Humans, in any given area, did what they were told by their  local Nefilim ruler.  If there indeed was a golden age of sexual  equality it existed because both male and female humans were in  an equally servile position:  you don't get to dominate as  females or as males when you are being dominated by a powerful  authority.  The time when male dominant groups began to overrun  the scene, described as catastrophically disruptive of peaceful  human society by the goddess researchers, coincides with the time  when the Nefilim phased off the planet.  When the cat's away...

The new paradigm does not denigrate the scholarly,  independent and impressive work of the goddess researchers. On  the contrary it affords a context in which an  even more robust  and dignified appreciation of our true history and women's' role  in it becomes manifest. Breaking the ancient mythic goddesspell is necessary to  arrive at the more profound realization that  Goddesshood is not  just a high metaphor; it is literally genetic.  Male dominance,  even though it has a deep base in the various godspell religions  focused on Yahweh who taught his male subjects to treat women as  inferior, cannot survive genetic enlightenment.  But we won't  have to wait for those religions to  disappear totally -- the  process is already well underway through attrition and suspicion -   - for it to diminish. Even though the word "obey" has been  eliminated from the marriage vows only recently and  the Pope is  not going to accept early retirement easily, it is going to  happen faster than anticipated. When  DNA speaks, everybody  listens.  

A Potential Problem, The Inevitable Outcome

 I feel it is important to sow the seed of thought concerning  a potential problem in the near future. If an official  announcement in any form by our or any government is made of the  alien presence on the planet -- I believe that to be the case  with regard to the little grays at least -- I think it will be  unfortunate if, in the heady excitement and novelty of that  event, all alien presence now or in the past is lumped together  and glazed over, we will miss the critical opportunity to  differentiate between the intra-solar system politics of our  genetic half-alien creation and a species possibly from beyond  the stars.  We must restore our own true history to ourselves to  gain the unassailable integrity necessary to know what we are,  what is good for us and not, what we can allow and not when  interacting with a species very different from ourselves.

 Having noted the convolutions of current philosophic and  scientific politics which would be almost amusing if it were not  for the very nasty results they have caused, we can be heartened  by the positive resolution that is clearly in sight.  All these  currents taken into account, the vectors are  coming closer and  closer to the target faster and faster. The next stage will come  when  the scientific evidence from all the various investigative  vectors begin to coalesce quickly and inexorably reach critical  mass.  The Mars material, the mitochondrial DNA  material, the  work of West and Schoch on the age of the Sphinx, the next  breaking information on the existence of planet X/Nibiru,  the  documentary material from the find in Sippar in Iraq if we can  get it out of there, perhaps even the crop circle decipherment,  the announcement by the government of this country of the alien  presence, etc. and, singularly, the full recognition of the  master thesis of Zecharia Sitchin.  At that point of critical mass the evidence will simply overwhelm the academic and scientific arenas and all scholars will be unable to ignore it.

The Ramifications For The Present And The Future

Although I have focused primarily on the current status of  the new paradigm with reference to current academic, scientific  and alternate explanations, my primary preoccupation  remains with the ramifications for our present and future. A  short summary of the resolutions and redefinitions for our  present and possibilities for our future as I deal with them in  Breaking The Godspell and God Games are as follows.

If we are the product of that advanced Nefilim technology,  we are a mutant species with bicameral genetics, bicameral mind,  a bicameral collective unconscious. Jungian psychology will have  to be totally revamped.

Evolution on this planet, if we indeed will be able  eventually to use that term accurately at all,  was linear until  interrupted by our decidedly non-Darwinian, pragmatic synthetic genesis.  From that point on we have experienced a precociously  rapid metamorphic process, a special case of evolution for lack  of a better metaphor,  under the  imperative of the prepotency of  our advanced Nefilim genetic component. It is in the integration  of the bicameral mind that what has been condemned as naive  hallucination is restored as our almost unthinkable history.

Institutional "religion" is a sublimation of the ancient  godspell, the subservient master-slave relationship.  The Babel  factor is about to be overcome and we can reach planetary unity  through the concept of our common origin and generic humanity.

Transcendental experience, in its generic form removed from  vague association with some god, magical practice, occult  doctrines or subservient godspell ego loss, may be redefined as   participation at the leading edge of our metamorphic self-exploration/expansion as the bicameral human gradually comes to  the recognition of its true nature as Homo Erectus-Nefilimus,  becoming truly sapient by that fact  and passing out of the  adolescence of the race. Once free, it becomes clear that fully  conscious transcendental experience may be understood as  conscious dimensional expansion. I believe that we are rapidly  evolving off the Cartesian monkey bars to habitual four-dimensional consciousness.

The genuine "occult" can now be understood scientifically to  be time release packages of advanced technical information  entrusted to us in "crash courses" in civilization until we could  break its code. Once we allow ourselves to freely begin to  reexamine these technological concepts as potentially real and  valuable we will gain much very rapidly.

Ooparts, high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, ostensibly out  of place in time are recognized as remnants of lost technology  and knowledge.   Physical immortality, possessed by the Nefilim probably  through genetic engineering and withheld from humans, is seen as  a collective preoccupation.  It has also been sublimated to the  status of reward in the afterlife with the god or gods. If you  can't get it here you will get it there if you do as the god(s)  says. But the real technology of immortality is already on the  horizon through genetic engineering and probably through the re-discovery of the mono atomic form of gold by David Hudson, quite  certainly the focus of the alchemical and some occult traditions,  lost over time but remembered as the goal.  Immortality will be  the primary, dominant characteristic of the dawning new phase of  our racial maturation, a matter of simple human dignity.

The characteristics that mark the new human are an  unassailable personal integrity, relativistic epistemology,  profound  compassion, robust depth of informational data,  understanding of  the universe in terms of a full unified field,  broad spectrum competence, transcendental competition, facility in dimensional shifting, preference  for dyadic operation,  a  profound ability to enjoy, to play the games most satisfying to  generic "gods", an expanded capacity to literally have great fun  creating new realities, with the primary focus on evolving  habitual  four dimensional consciousness and contributing to the  definition of our racial evolutionary trajectory.

The new synthesis subsumes the groundswell rising to a new  politic, enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or Western  mysticism, a third culture, political notions of a new world  order,  spiritualized psychology, cerebral turning points,  religion as we have ever conceived it. It points to a new  plateau of civilization and culture fitting of the new human.   And what if the Nefilim return?  They were the landlords but  their deed has run out.  We, perhaps, should convert the SETI  search apparatus into a transceiving device focused on Nibiru and  let it be known that we would like to take the kids on a first  visit to the grandparents place.  But only if we can be accepted  as an independent and mature species.  If they come back throwing  their weight around they are going to have a real problem with  me. We should not fall back into  the old godspell subservient posture in the event that the  Nefilim come back any more than a mature adult should remain  subservient to parental authority.

What to do after you get genetically enlightened and have  broken the  godspell, the effect of the ancient, subservient,  looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy-to-return, master-slave attitude,  the deepest dye in the fabrics of Eastern and Western culture?   We will operate as our own "gods", according to our own genetic  credentials, play our own god games according to our own  transcendental choices, creating our own confident realities.   And play those god games in the context of relative immortality,  with an unassailable integrity and racial identity which will  enable us to step confidently into stellar society.