I will post here links and articles on topics that appear
to be of high significance.
Web sites which I highly recommend for keeping abreast
of the current developments in technology and science, the first two
of which you can subscribe to free, are: http://www.arlingtoninstitute.org
(John Petersen's think tank where I was invited
to brief Pentagon officers) http://www.kurzweilai.net
(Ray Kurzweil's site, the ai is for artificial intelligence.
Ray is the author of The Age of Spiritual Machines, highly
recommended.)
Recent underwater archaeological
discoveries of cities and constructions
A whole new window on the past
is opened by archaeological finds around the world of underwater
cities and ruins that appear to pre-date Sumer by thousands of years. Two
links are given here to introduce this topic to the reader as an area of study
that is just developing and promises to fill out our knowledge of our past
significantly. Many of the sites, flooded out at the
end of the last ice age, contain structures of advanced construction
which archaeologists note would be beyond the capacity of the humans as
they conceive of their capabilities living in those times, perhaps 10,000
to 12,000 years ago ---- although there are historical references to these
now underwater areas in both recorded and oral history of the regions in
India. One might expect that Indian scientists would keep to the scientific
paradigm, although it is frustrating, and so not speculate.
The Indian scientists do freely recognize that there are references
to these ancient sites extant in Indian history and are reconsidering the
dating of the writing of the history. By and large, however, Indian
scientists do not seem to give much attention Sitchin's material, perhaps
because it is focused more on the Middle East. Graham Hancock has become focused on these sites
and has been diving on them personally to investigate. He has compared the
archaeological information and dating gathered by scientists and himself
with the recorded and oral histories concerning some of these sites extant
in India. But Graham is also familiar with Sitchin's thesis and scholarship
and it would be very valuable to compare the new information with the information
that Sitchin has published about the Anunnaki. Since the Anunnaki had been
here from around 432,000 years ago according to Sitchin, created us some
200,000 years ago, obviously they would have been in a position to build
or have humans build cities and centers any place on the planet they chose
and would be the most likely candidates for investigation. It may sustain
the mystery to simply claim a "lost civilization" but, as revealed
over and over again in the Middle East and the Americas and India on currently
dry land, these may be yet more sites built by or directed to be built
by the Anunnaki. At very least, because of the history already well
known to that effect and it's fundamental importance to the restoration
of our real history, it is only reasonable that a serious determination
should be made as to a connection to the Anunnaki or not. Either way,
a significant contribution would be made. Constructive references,
new information, may be contributed by emailing me directly at [show email address]
Because there is a feedback loop
between the recognition of the new paradigm of our half alien beginnings
and history and the recognition of the general alien presence around and
on our planet, the recent announcement by the Mexican government and its
department of defense that they officially have recognized the UFO
phenomenon and alien presence as real and are investigating is significant.
As many of you know, Mexico has been awash in video-documented UFO
sightings for about 14 years. Here's the latest development, with photos
and radar information from the Mexican Dept. of Defense. The translation
is a bit awkward in places, but the story is certainly intriguing.
Always follow up any items mentioned here by Google
search to keep up with developments.
E-LOG
"News", on this site, may seem a bit
strange to anyone expecting the latest on politics, religion, the economy,
science and social issues as usually dealt with in the context
of the planetary status quo. The reason for this is that, set
against the context of the new paradigm of our realevolutionary development,
the current situation is just a blip on the evolutionary screen,
but, in my perception, a very significant one.
True, the current American administration, and the Republican party
have been literally hijacked by the Leo Straussian ideologues of the Project
For A New American Century who make Machiavelli look like Mr. Rogers.
True, they have formed the image of the current President in the
likeness of a born-again fundamentalist and have, thereby,
skillfully captured the support and vote of the dominionists http://www.moscowtimes.ru/stories/2004/03/12/120.htmland the radical fundamental religionists. True, these
radical fundamentalists are really theocrats, desire a government
that administers the country according to their interpretation, mostly
Old Testament, of their version of the Bible. The PNAC political
fundamentalists http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-3-77-1542.jspdesire to run the country not as a democratic republic
but by philosopher princes (as they understand themselves) as close to
a Mussolini defined corporate fascism as they
can achieve. In the largest perspective both factions are attempting
to run the evolutionary video in fast reverse while simultaneously denying
that it exists. Evolution is right on schedule, however, and they will
fail. It would be amusing even if not for the fact that yet another generation
of our young and thousands upon thousands of persons are killed in
war without end.
To criticize or attack the positions of the PNAC for their
systematic deception of the citizens and use of their children
as cannon fodder, or the Dominionists and fundamentalists as not really
being Christians because they put harsh Old Testament precepts foremost,
is to be distracted by relatively superficial facts and focus.
To critique the Dominionists and fundamentalists because they insist
on an interpretation that the world and all in it were created in a literal
six days in 4004 B.C. or that they desire war rather than peace because
their B-movie version of the Book of Revelations demands Armageddon
occur soon, the Jews be converted, the Muslims wiped out, the second
Temple of Jerusalem be built so they can get raptured up and their conception
of Jesus can come back and rule the world, is still to miss the real point.
At a factual, historical level, the Bible, taken unquestioned
as the source authority of their conviction and interpretation by the
fundamentalists and evangelicals, is a composite (old and new testament
) of Jewish scriptures. But, as Sitchin has pointed out, ( Genesis
Revisited, chap. 3) "It is regrettable that both sides [Creationists and
Evolutionists] pay little heed to what has been known for more than a
century ---- that the creation tales of Genesis are edited and abbreviated
versions [in some cases warped and forged, ] of much older detailed Mesopotamian
text. " It has also long been recognized by scholars that, just as
the Assyrians' had substituted their national god's name, Ashur,
in the genesis text for the older Sumerians', the Babylonians had substituting
their national god's name, Marduk for Ashur's and, subsequently, the
Hebrews substituted their national god's name, Yahweh, in their turn.
The new testament is a composite of books accepted by the Roman
Catholic Church some three hundred years after the time of Jesus. Some
traditional books were excluded. This was done to meet the agenda and
dogma of the Pope and bishops. As Sir Laurence Gardner has pointed
out, the "infallibility" of the Pope is based on a forged document:
so much for the authority dictating the "divine"nature
of the New Testament Scriptures. Sir Laurence has also demonstrated
conclusively that the heterodox kingship tradition of Christianity is,
in actuality, the Holy Grail. This special bloodline of benevolent kings,
the first, Cain, fathered by the Anunnaki scientist, Enki, in Sumerian,
by a human woman, the Eve of Genesis, coming down, at one point,
through Jesus and Mary Magdalene, his wife, and their children was
the tradition threatening to the power of the orthodox Roman Church which
attempted to wipe it out unmercifully by violence and the Inquisition.
At the most fundamental critical level is the demonstrated
fact that the source of the original, scientific genesis history was the
Anunnaki who taught it to humans and the God of the Judeo-Christian tradition
was one of them, a humanoid alien. Another Anunnaki (the word in Sumerian
means "those who came down from the heavens") was El (the word for a god,
singular, used a a personal name in this case), Nannar Sin, was/is Allah,
in arabic, El, the God of the Moslems, if Sitchin is correct. The religions of the world and the civilizations
formed by them will be at odds until our real human history is no longer
ignored and suppressed and we can come planetarily together as generic
humans. Our contemporary world situation and the constant horrors we do
to each other are just the latest poorly masked versions of the theo-political
"my god is better than your god" conflicts. It would seem that we are reaching
a climactic point, however, due to the intensity of zeal of the fundamentalists'
of both godspell religions, neo-Christian and Islamic, and
the greater and greater denial and suppression that both sides feel compelled
to exert to control those who are already ready for planetary generic human
society beyond religious, civilzational separatism. Yes, all persons
and groups should be allowed freedom of belief. But, if those beliefs
engender or compel those who hold them to damage or destroy individuals
or their freedom who do not believe as they do they should be prevented
or arrested. If those beliefs incite individuals or groups to damage
or destroy or attempt to replace the society or institutions that guarantee
and protect their freedom of belief in the first place, then they should
be curtailed in their actions.
It may well be that the self-fulfilling nature of the drive to Armageddon
and the end times, on the part of the Dominionists and fundamentalists,
will trigger a crisis that, by its threatening militancy and inevitable
failure will reduce it to the status of the flat earth dogma in the eyes
of the entire world and open consideration of a truly new world of planetary
unity.
It is insufficient, however, to simply put current events into perspective
against the context of the new paradigm. At this point in time,
although we are afforded an understanding of our real beginnings, our
true history and, from that knowledge and genetic enlightenment,
hope and a view of our future trajectory, the vision can be no less
than that of a stellar society. We need to move quickly and confidently
beyond civilization, as we have known it, to a focus as a species ready
to take its place among the stars.