Key to Unlocking the Locked-in Legacies
is emerging now is a sense that something else -- neither mechanistic
(Darwin) nor theistic (the Bible) -- is going on. But mainstream science
will have none of this ambiguity, and reactively tars all non-Darwinian
notions with the broad brush of "biblical superstition." The net
result has become a sort of silly high drama in which one flavor of
pseudoscience attempts to do battle with another”.
John Anthony West
While the evolutionists and the creationists have been
battling it out through dramatic episodes of the Scopes soaps,
another explanatory paradigm has been developing exponentially
which subsumes, corrects, and makes obsolete, specifically relative
to the human species, both of those rather primitive paradigms. While
the scientific imperialists and the religious dogmatists have thought
that they owned the discussion by proprietarily boxing the argument
and defining the binary options, the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin,
has advanced a robust and coherent paradigm of our genesis and unique
history that, if true, ----- and I am convinced that it is after working
critically with it for 28 years ----- is profound, comprehensive, and
fundamental enough to enable us to rewrite the entire history of our beginnings
and the planet astronomically, evolutionarily, paleontologically, archaeologically
and, literally, redefine ourselves as humans. Sitchin’s thesis illuminates
that antique conflict with Nobel prize quality research, renders the, by
now, Monty Pythonesque arguments outmoded, subsumes and corrects creationism,
redefines Darwinism as well as its latter day detractions. He has been
able to do this because he reads Sumerian as well as the Semitic languages
including ancient and Modern Hebrew, and is steeped in the history. He
has had the advantage of access to the accumulated scholarship and archaeological
material from the Middle East rediscovered only in the last one hundred
and fifty years.
Revisited: The Sitchin Paradigm
For a more
complete and detailed synopsis of the Sitchin thesis, the context
and historical background needed to understand it, the proofs of its
validity and scientific objections regarding it answered, see Appendix A
Zecharia Sitchin, one of two
hundred Sumerian scholars on the planet who can read a cuneiform
clay tablet like you and I can read a newspaper, has demonstrated
that the Anunnaki/Nefilim (Sumerian/Hebrew: those who came down [from
the heavens] ) , the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient
civilizations from the tenth planet in our solar system, Nibiru, colonized
Earth 432,000 years ago and created the human species 200,000 years ago,
by genetically crossing their genes with Homo Erectus. Corroboration
comes from evidence for Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory ,
the Infrared search by the IRAS satellite in ‘83-’84; genetically from
the mitochondrial DNA "search for Eve"; anthropologically from the "out
of Africa" data placing our genesis in Central Africa 200,000 years;
enigmatic ooparts and close to two million pieces of artifact and documentation
recovered directly from the ancient civilizations. Our modern science
has provided a means of identifying advanced science in the ancient past
previously thought of as fantastic even for us. The advances in our scientific
discoveries in genetics, mitochondrial DNA research, space and planetary
science, archaeology, paleontology, anthropology, and linguistics as well
as even the physics of metallurgy have enabled Sitchin to demystify the
advanced technologies of the Anunnaki and identify and explain ooparts
. We have progressed from being their slave animals to limited partnership
and, since they phased off Earth, are now phasing out of a 3000 year traumatic
transition to racial independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under
the imperative of our advanced Nefilim genetic component.
Central to the history of the Anunnaki’s occupation
of the planet was the interaction between two brothers, Enlil and
Enki. Enki was their chief scientist who was responsible, with
his sister Ninhursag, their chief medical officer, for the genetic
creation of our species. Enki, obviously, was sympathetic towards
humans and promoted our interests and us. Enlil, eventually known as Jehovah/YHWH,
of the Old Testament, maintained the position that humans were to remain
slaves, totally subservient to the Anunnaki and him especially.
The Anunnaki phased off this planet at the latest around
1250 B.C. For some three thousand years, subsequently, we humans
have been going through a very traumatic transition to racial independence.
Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as to who knew
and knows what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return or when
they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals learned under
the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and strife broke out between
them. Religious ritual is the transmutation of palace servant duties.
The serving of favorite roasted meats on the Anunnaki table became the
offering of “burnt offerings” on the table now become an “altar”, the
transportation of the Anunnaki local ruler on a dais became a procession
of statues, the Anunnaki palaces became “temples”, etc. The Anunnaki were,
clearly and unambiguously, known to the humans who were in contact with them
as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids (taller and huskier than we, male
and female, the males bearded. We look like they look because we are half
Anunnaki). It was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually sublimated
into cosmic character and status and, later on, conveniently mythologized.
Breaking the godspell has seen us go through the stages of abandonment
to dissociation, transmutation, religion, rebellion and now to recovery.
We have been dysfunctionally looking to the sky where they went for some
three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions. We are ready to step
out of racial adolescence.
The "occult" is time-release packages of advanced
technological information entrusted to us in "crash courses" in
civilization, often lost through time, now being recovered through
the clues and recognition afforded by our own science. Ooparts,
high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, “out of place” in time are remnants
of lost technology and knowledge. Transcendental experience is redefined
in terms of dimensional expansion of consciousness and perception.
We are rapidly evolving to habitual four-dimensional consciousness.
Transcendence is conscious metamorphic dimensional exploration, participatory
expansion at the leading edge of our special-case evolution. The totems
and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled, Prometheus can get
off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off his dung heap
and complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and reach genetic
Mythology is our greatest myth. We can move beyond
the interpretation of the gods as myth, Jungian archetypes,
and schizophrenic hallucinations. History as hallucination and
“mythinformation”, after two hundred years of explanatory failure,
although still hiding behind tenure in the university and between
the glossy pages of new age magazines, is a dead issue.
Why is the Sitchin paradigm so pivotal? It is the meta-paradigm
that affords the potential to remove the resultant, stultifying,
locked-in legacies that have kept up separate and enervated for millennia.
The new paradigm is so encompassing and penetrating that it is a unique
meta-wild card: it redefines every cardinal element of human existence
that we think we have understood including a redefinition of our evolution,
all our cultures, our religions and of our very selves.
Those who talk of a singularity, a shearing drop to
extreme novelty and fundamental revolutionary change at some near
point in our future that is so profound that it will change human nature
do not have to look any further than the Sitchin paradigm. It is there
for the acceptance and it will rewrite the entirety of our history and
redefine human nature. After a century and a half of examination
and attempted explanation ---- and suppression ---- of the historical,
archaeological, anthropological and astronomical evidence accumulated,
no other explanatory paradigm comes close to the totally coherent,
robust and logical Sitchin thesis. Can and will it be improved or corrected?
Just within the time of the writing of this paper there
has been a report of the discovery, by satellite scan, of a city,
two miles by fivemiles in area, under thirty feet of water in
the ocean twenty five miles off the northwest coast of India.
Preliminary carbon dating of dredged materials from the site indicate
its age as nine thousand years old, placing it earlier than Sumer. The
histories of India (declared myth by the British because they were older
than the Empire) speak in detail about civilizations and humans in the
very remote past and mention this city by name.
What appears to be a city has been reported off the
coast of Cuba under an astounding 2100 feet of water, discovered
by professional treasure wreck hunters using sophisticated equipment.
The Takenouchi documents and artifacts, ancient treasure
of the Japanese Emperor guarded for 2500 years by the family of
the highest Shinto priest caste family, speak of an alien civilization
coming here from space and founding the human race.
All these facts and histories need to be studied thoroughly
and integrated with the histories and data from the entire planet.
We have much work to do. The planetary benefits will be enormous.
Besides the obvious general advantage of working from a consensual
understanding and definition of what a generic human is, we can eliminate
the characterizations of the perennial conflicts as being between
“progress and piety” or between creationism and evolution, or science
and faith. The new paradigm finally and conclusively resolves the
creation-evolutionary conflict specifically concerning our unique genesis.
If the new paradigm is substantially correct then the box is illusory,
the creationists are only half wrong and the evolutionists are only
half right: there was a creation but it took place in a genetic laboratory;
there is a human evolutionary process but it was interrupted by the Anunnaki
inserting their genes into the Homo Erectus gene code, a very pragmatic,
non-Darwinian kind of interference. We were created and we are evolving
but both in unique ways.
In short: the entire set of world views, theistic,
theo-political, cultural, philosophical and scientific that purport
to explain our genesis, history, and development as a species are
about to be replaced as we recover finally from racial amnesia. The
revolution is inevitable. It will take probably a century to fully
accomplish socially because of the sweepingly profound nature of the
resulting change, the natural resistance of the established institutions,
and the need to reeducate and transition without disorientation. The
new world view is gradually taking hold, cannot be ignored, and is waiting
in the wings. It is only a matter of time. A unique and vital characteristic
is that it addresses and explains and redefines the root source of all
the ancient religions of the world on a common basis so that no particular
religion can claim privileged status of any kind. Religion, as we know
it, will be understood in the context of our unique history.
The significance and ramifications of this tremendous
body of work, correlated with findings from all other disciplines,
as they bear on our present and future, has been my primary focus
since 1976 when I began work on Breaking the Godspell, the reaction
to which has been predictable and certainly not boring.
There is no better example of the Galileo effect (we
will not look through your telescope because we know what you say
you see can’t be so) in the academic and scientific arenas than the
reaction to the Sitchin paradigm. Campus, scientific, and theological
imperialism and the fields of anthropology, archaeology, and astronomy,
particularly, have tried all the usual unprofessional, unscholarly,
shunning, chest thumping, fang baring, proprietary turf posturing and
ad hominem attacks through teeth clenched in tenure tetanus, but the thesis
becomes more and more robust as new evidence comes in continually from
archaeology, anthropology, astronomy, genetics and other disciplines.
If Darwin’s thesis was a blockbuster, Sitchin’s thesis is a hydrogen
bomb. We may have been able to afford to dally with Darwin and defer to
religion for as long as we have but the rapid changes in modern times will
force us to consider Sitchin’s thesis seriously and intensely on a much
Of course, most scientists and sophisticated scholars
consider themselves enlightened in that they espouse some form of
Darwinian evolutionary theory as the party line, although there are
serious arguments even within the scientific arena as to the full validity
of the Darwinian thesis. Generally, philosophers and scientists apologize
if they think they are even possibly sounding like creationists, spend
most of their energy in either promulgating some version of Darwinian
evolution or attacking what they judge to be its too radical application,
get entangled in arguments about whether Darwinian evolution can be
invoked to explain human creativity, even aesthetics, and generally
put down any other explanation out of hand.
The general thesis of the evolutionist, therefore,
reads like this: the acceptance of evolution as the mechanism by
which we came about causes us to understand that we are a collection
of biological molecules, interacting with each other as in a mechanism,
according to well defined laws and rules derived from physics and chemistry
---- although not all known or understood by humans as yet. Defining
consciousness within this biological model is still a pivotal problem:
some say it is simply an epiphenomenon, an effect of the operation of
all the parts of the brain working in consort, some say it is the subjective
self-perception of herself or himself by the individual, some say it
must be based in some “new stuff”, some new physics or chemistry that
we don’t yet understand.
Across the general population, however, we do not even
agree on whether we are evolving, what the process really is if,
indeed, we are evolving, from what source and how we began, and in
what direction and on what trajectory, whatever that process is,
we are headed. We do not agree, even more fundamentally, as to what
criteria to use to judge these matters. We are not discussing the same
entity. Creationists, obviously, do not think of humans as having evolved
in the past or as evolving in the present. If we do not agree that
we are evolving, can evolve, or whether any evolution of a species or
individual must be by mindless Darwinian mechanisms, or whether there
are effective methodologies for expediting conscious self evolution,
we will continue to be at standstill. It is quite ironical, however,
that even most of those who hold for some evolutionary view of humankind
evolving to human status in the past do not seem to think in terms of
humans evolving in the present, much less having a well defined conceptualization
of what that process might be.
Charles Darwin published his arguments for evolution
in 1859, one hundred and forty three years ago. Schliemann opened
the buried Pandora’s box of our real archaeological history in 1873,
one hundred and twenty four years ago. Sitchin, having gained the
advantage of discoveries in archaeology, astronomy, space travel, genetics
and linguistics as elucidating and explanatory tools, published first
only in 1976, already over a quarter century ago. Using this rough chronology
as a guide, we might anticipate, even with some exponential bit of acceleration,
that the initial general recognition and acceptance of the Sitchin paradigm
will not happen for, perhaps, some fifty years. We really can’t afford,
however, to see Kuhn’s thesis that scientific revolutions take
place only by the old guard dying off rather than by an acceptance through
careful study, critique and proving out, borne out once again.
Genetics As Sociobiology 1A
In searching for a word to clearly distinguish between
the various Darwinian type theories of evolution usually applied
to all species including ours, and our unique evolution as revealed
by our history, science and genetics I have found it convenient
to invent the word “Realevolution” . Clearly we are evolving
but in an accelerated, unique way after coming into existence
through a genetic engineering project. That we have adapted
loosely in a Darwinian sense over time is also true but the
fact that we realize we can control and manipulate our realevolutionary
progress and direction goes far beyond the concept of natural selection
by chance genetic mutations.
Consider the facts of our unique genetics and differences
from any other anthropoid or humanoid. Current investigation says
our genetics are about 98 percent the same as a chimp’s. Regardless,
that two, perhaps only one percent obviously makes a vast difference.
We have 46 chromosomes, primates have 48 and the fusion of the second
and third chromosomes in primates is a mystery. Even today, the anthropological
sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor species for us; Homo
Erectus is currently being promoted. We were contemporaneous with Neanderthals
or even preceded them. We showed up too suddenly in the chronology
of the fossil record. We present with very many startling, obvious differences
from primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species,
are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow ridges, eye sockets
far more rectangular than round; relatively tiny nasal passages; small
flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular strength and bone density;
our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair, throats, and salt management
are completely different. Human females do not have an estrus cycle.
We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to say the very least.
It becomes quite obvious why we (as a product of a melding of two racial
gene codes where quality control was conditioned by pragmatic purposes)
have some four thousand genetic defects and counting rather than none
to a handful as all other species, in light of the complexity of the merging.
Homo erectus, our half ancestor, took a million years to go from rough
flaked stone tools to smooth ones. You could hardly notice any change.
We have come from square one to going to Mars in only some 200,000 years.
If the Sitchin paradigm is correct, all these facts are explained easily.
If we ignore this body of information as we read out and work with the
human genome we handicap ourselves unnecessarily and deprive ourselves
of valuable clues and understanding. Darwinian principles may generally apply
to hominid species before us but they clearly do not apply to our unique
synthetic genesis and subsequent development except as a minor theme in
our climatic and incidental regional adaptations.
If the Anunnaki were interested only in engineering
what clearly amounted to disposable units then it may reasonably
be inferred that the completeness of the engineering would not have
to have been taken to the maximum. This is, in the opinion of this
author, the basis for the four thousand plus genetic diseases and
defects we present. It has been argued, theoretically, that, although
the vast majority of the species on this planet present with only
a few typical genetic diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative
complexity of our organism. However, we are not that much more complex
genetically than even the higher primates and this argument does not
Sociobiology, as introduced and propounded by E. O.
Wilson, is founded on Darwinian evolutionary theory, and the
"unappealing proposition" that genetic variation and chance are
the only cause for the existence of human kind, inferring a complete
biological determinism. There is difficulty, however, in accounting
for the disconcertingly rapid accelerations obvious in our species’
brief history in which the slow genetic mutational and chance factors
have been rapidly outrun by our cultural and consciousness developments.
It may well be that we are totally determined in our action and thought
by our biology but the very fact that we can recognize that possibility
and discuss it begs the question How then are we determined? Wilson’s
honesty causes him to acknowledge that we have reached a point where we
can consciously influence the course of our evolution. The new paradigm
affords a context and perspective in which to understand our species’
precocity in terms of the rapid ascendance or our advanced Anunnaki genetic
base. We can return to the subject of man's ultimate nature with confidence,
freedom to radically experiment and explore with understanding and humor.
The same reductionistic science that would honestly insist that we are
totally determined by an infinitely regressive loop of ultimately quantum
mechanical events is already telling us that we are determined to transcend
in an infinitely progressive loop of fractal like expansions. If we are totally
determined, we are clearly determined to determine our own determinism.
The fact that we have modified since our inception
according to Darwinian adaptations to general climatic, regional
and cultural vectors becomes a minor theme in the overview of ourselves
as the precocious leading edge of a synthesized species metamorphosing
rapidly, driven by our bicameral genetic engine. The “unappealing
proposition” loses its sting: the truth, regardless of its content,
tends to set one free. The new paradigm explains completely the seeming
anomalies of acceleration, ooparts and syncretisms so apparent in the
human situation, and is a definitive explanation of why our species’
"biological evolution is always quickly outrun by cultural change".
Focus for the Genome Project and Genetic Research
The Sitchin paradigm provides a comprehensive context
in which to understand and explain the enigmatic facts and anthropological
anomalies of the Darwinian model of our species existence, which
we have already amassed. It provides the context and data for bringing
the efforts of geneticists and the genome projects, often scattered
for a variety of reasons, to a focus on correcting and perfecting the
genetic code, eliminating all disease and handicaps, and providing us
the option of immortality.
Immortality is a pivotal topic in all considering and
learning from all phases of the Anunnaki-human history. We know,
directly from the records, of their decisions that the Anunnaki did
not give us the relatively extreme longevity or immortality they possessed
by conscious deliberate decision. It did not fit their purposes:
we were invented as slave workers. The records also show, however,
that, over time, a handful of humans were granted immortality also
by deliberate decision as a reward for being good subordinates in various
roles usually as kings/foremen or for carrying out some critical mission.
Another lesson: there may well be identifiable gene sequences that control
the aging and dying process that are clearly and definitely manipulatable
giving indication that we will be able to rectify their possible deliberate
During the genetic investigations now in process, therefore,
it would be valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to
be constantly inspecting the results of the decipherment for signs
of the genetic merging, and to develop protocols to determine such, if
needed, as well as following the clues mentioned herein. By doing so,
interpretations and explanations may possibly be facilitated, progress
accelerated and a far more comprehensive overview of the genome achieved.
The information gained would be, reciprocally, a major, pivotal, invaluable
resultant spin-off contribution to our species’ evolutionary, anthropological,
and cultural generic history. Understanding our bicameral gene code
in the context of the new paradigm will facilitate the elimination of
the schizoid puzzles in our collective and individual psyches and the
correction and perfecting of our genetics.
An Emergent Wild Card
How primitive are we? The view from 2100 says very
primitive indeed: we are only beginning to approach the
time when all diseases are preventable and curable. We still pollute
our environment and cause ourselves disease. We have not
overcome aging and death and are afraid of immortality. We get born,
no owner’s manual, to often dubiously qualified, puzzled and puzzling
parents, subject to a multitude of diseases, struggle to make sense out
of what the hell existence on this planet in this universe is all about
and how to deal with it, wonder why there are so many conflicting philosophies
and institutions claiming cosmic franchising and, often, why the universe
seems so unfair and then we die. We are generally conditioned by theocultural
traditions to accept these bizarre conditions as “normal”’ and the will
of some god.
If we rethink our situation in terms of our restored
history, however, things make a great deal more sense although,
for now, there may not be a planetary cure or relief for some of them.
If we recognize that we are the product of a genetically engineered
melding of two quite different gene codes, literally a bicameral
species, displaying a decidedly non-Darwinian kind of evolutionary
development, just now beginning to step out of racial adolescence,
only now beginning to grasp our racial psychology, possessing a gene
code that, significantly and disconcertingly, manifests four thousand
and counting potential genetic defects, struggling desperately with
a short life span and certain mortality, we will know precisely who
and what we are. By enabling us to break the godspell we are
freed to collectively work toward planetarily common goals in genetic
science: the correction of the defects in our genetic code, the elimination
of diseases in all of mankind, the providing of the option of immortality
In the greatest perspective, perhaps we should recognize
from the outset that immortality will be both a new and awesome
plateau of human existence offering as yet probably undreamed potential
and yet, without denigrating that potential at all, ultimately just
another "trip", just another step in our meta-evolution, the rapid
metamorphosis we have been undergoing since our beginning. Within
those extremes there is the greatest latitude for the inevitable expansion
into dimensions which will allow us to become far wiser, individually,
through greater experience, greater learning, and the ability to witness
the patterns of repetitions of extended periodicity. Eliminating the
pressure of a short life span that influences our choices and cramps our
lives will not just give us the practical potential to travel easily between
star systems and send the insurance companies into the re-edit mode; it
will change our perspective and our social interactions, certainly the
entirety of human existence, radically.
and The Old New Age
even no religion,
They say I’m a dreamer,
But I’m not the only one.
Over the last 2000 years we have seen scientific or
pseudoscientific doctrines espoused by the various religions being
contradicted or demolished and the religions, repeatedly, although
with great delay, change their positions with regard to our genesis,
history, evolution and science, and modify their doctrines. But the
new paradigm addresses the very root doctrines, positions, claimed divine
franchise and authority of all the religions of the world and will eventually
cause the obsolescence of all institutionalized religions springing
from our ancient relationship of subservience to the Anunnaki.
Religion, as we know it, is the transmutation of the
Anunnaki-human relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery
and then limited, subservient partnership, the godspell. The concept
of God, capital G, has gradually developed through the cosmification
of the various Anunnaki rulers Enlil (Jehovah/YHWH), Enki (Adonai,
the Lord), Allah (El/Nannar/Sin), among others, gradually embellished
with the heady concepts of metaphysical speculation. It has lately
become a sort of faux ecumenical gloss: the TV news quotes the Koran
as saying “There is no God but God” when it should be “There is no god
but Allah”, a completely different meaning. The god of the Judeo-Roman
Christian tradition, Jehovah YHWH was – quite possibly still is -- the
flesh and blood Anunnaki individual, Enlil, eventually cosmified into
the absolute creator of the universe, eventually spoken of as infinite
love, infinite justice, infinite this or infinite that, through the bishops
and the scholastic philosophers and theologians.
The idea of a cosmic, infinite principle “God”,
as many of us still take it for granted, is a thoroughly mixed composite
concept of the sublimation of the anthropomorphic and imperfect Anunnaki
individuals, the “deities” of slave code religions; metaphysical abstractions
accumulated over time through the speculations of the revered philosophers
from the Greeks onward; the Hellenic influenced, theo-philosophical
teachings of the Roman Church scholastic tradition and mystics; flavored
with the concepts of theists, deists, agnostics, theosophists and mystics
of any number of sects; and thoroughly leavened by the concepts
of the consciousness expanding disciplines and metaphysical doctrines
of the East, sprinkled with our own individual intellectual and emotional
subjective variations and usually still conditioned by the godspell
element of subservience. But that cosmified, composite, intellectual
abstraction is not the Jehovah/YHWH or Jesus of the Judeo-Christian
religions, the Prime Mover of Thomas Aquinas or the Omega point of De
Chardin, the Allah of the Muslim faith, the Brahma of Hinduism, the
Buddha, or the Tao or deity of the religion of your choice.
Many who do not realize this crucial distinction, do not want to,
or are not ready to, take refuge in the Big-G little-g syndrome,
a sort of halfway shelter on the way to genetic enlightenment.
That position is articulated as, “I see the real historical nature
of the “gods”, the little “g’s”, but that does not shake my belief
in a Big G”. That way they can still subscribe to the platitudes
that the “God of all religions” is beyond individual doctrinal differences
and contradictory theologies, “all paths lead to the same
God” and similar inane notions. The new paradigm affords us the opportunity
to sort all these elements out, identify the different individual real
gods of the various religions, place them and ourselves in historical
perspective and recognize the metaphysical conceptualizations of “deity”,
East and West, as a product of our own evolving racial psychology.
Yes, the new paradigm means that religion and religions,
as we know them, will have to bow out. The godspell phenomenon has
two parts: we need to overcome the slave mentality of dependence and
subservience and we need to discard the institutional religions which
sprang from and dominated through it, especially the radical fundamentalism,
West and East, that is ultimately tearing the race apart. The role
of the theologian then becomes the facilitating of planetary reconciliation
in the transition to the time beyond religion.
The institutional, slave-code, godspell religions,
have fixed dogmas which are directly contradicted by the new paradigm.
They claim divine franchise by gods who are now radically redefined.
They claim absolute authority over the disciplines that produce the
information that would demonstrate their true historical nature. The
ultimate driving force will most probably be a degree of desperation
and desire for peace gradually manifesting in the entire planetary population
so strong that it will cause an abandonment of the authoritarian leaders
and dogmas of the religions, followed by a younger generation of clerics
who will recognize the inevitable and introduce new interpretations and
relaxed rules to gradually smooth the phase out and transition, hopefully
to humanitarian organizations and peace movements. The signs of
transition of some religious organizations to charitable and ecological
focus may be seen as an almost inchoate beginning of this kind of transformation.
It would also be foolish not to expect diehard fundamentalist backlash.
Is this atheism? No, paradoxically, not as such. Not
as we have defined atheism previously as the denial of the existence
of any kind of god, cosmic or otherwise. It simply is a long overdue
correction of some local, intra-solar system politics, relatively
rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective. Garden variety atheism can
now be understood as an early sign of precocious species adolescent rebellion
and questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid
characteristics of whatever sublimated local Anunnaki "god" is still the
object of worship (the original meaning of worship was “work for”: AVOD
= work). Yes, the subservient godspell religious stage will be surpassed.
The resultant freedom, however, will engender and foster greater
curiosity about reality and a seeking for ultimate causes far more metaphysically
adequate and commensurate with our expanding consciousness far beyond
even the search for the Law of Everything. The element of transcendence
associated with some religions will be, at minimum, understood
as generic consciousness expansion into higher and higher dimensionality.
Neither is this materialistic reductionism although
it does force us to reconsider the notion of the “spiritual”. What
is needed is a complete overhaul of all our metaphors and concepts
of the “spiritual” because the great majority of them are embedded
in our cultural fabric and consciousness as leftovers from Judeo-Roman
Catholic theology and second hand Eastern philosophies. The importance
of this overhaul is critical because it involves the concepts of mind,
consciousness, intelligence, will, self-awareness, transcendence,
Babel Factor: Human Over-Unity
The new paradigm is the basis, perhaps the only adequate
basis, for a profound unification of all humanity. Not some superficial
token ecumenicism or social homogenization of peoples and cultures
and philosophies but a unification that frees us to be one species
and explains and enhances our diversity of adaptations and cultures
and contributions. The cumulative evidence and restored history has
enabled us to grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our traumatic
transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species adolescence and
amnesia into species maturity. All the political, economic, social, scientific,
new age, evolutionary variables are only symptomatic; the genetic level
is where the profound realization must blossom. The restoration of our
generic history and a generic definition of what a human is afford us
the advancement that will take the planet off hold.
This is the end game of an age, be certain. A new human
and a new civilization beyond religion and the old new age are on
the horizon. I submit that the most fundamental, profound, overarching,
sociological transformation we are going through at this point in our
history is the change from the theo-politically controlled and manipulated
explanations of our beginnings and history to species independence.
We are witnessing the last gasp of religious fundamentalism worldwide.
Whether we chose to acknowledge it or not, we are already well into
one of “…. those Grand Moments when the whole scale of being is reevaluated”
as John Petersen has characterized it. It is within these redefinitions
that the resolutions to the problems and obstacles deeply embedded
in our species’ and individual psyches’ are to be found. To paraphrase
Dylan Thomas rather crudely, let us not go blind into that daylight.
But how do we accomplish the transition from our current planetary standstill
to planetary consensus gracefully and quickly? It’s best to recognize
from the outset that the revolution required, the meta-wild card so
radical in its implications and ramifications and requirements, that
there is no single discipline, no institution, certainly no individual
or group who can bring it about alone. It is so planetarily encompassing
that stepping outside of this box is almost impossible. The change will
have to come from within.
Science, the closest we have come to a common ground,
a common criterion, has played and will continue to play a pivotal
role in the recognition and acceptance of the new worldview.
Astronomy will demonstrate the existence of the tenth
planet unequivocally --- the IRAS, Infrared Imaging Satellite, quite
obviously discovered it in ‘83-’84 --- and, reluctantly, recognize
the correspondence of the details gradually accumulated with the ancient
data we now possess. The curiosity about the existence of the Anunnaki
on Nibiru/Planet X will become overwhelming and contact through spacecraft
and signaling will commence.
Archaeology, for the last one hundred and fifty years,
has been making the major contributions of data and will continue
to do so. Only recently, the science of genetics has been
able to refine, sometimes correct, archaeological and anthropological
estimates and dating. Because of the intertwining of the archaeological
and genetic information concerning our unique genesis, genetics has
already and should continue to be a major tool and contributing science
to the new paradigm.
The more robust the scientific information becomes
the easier it will be for the religions of the world to accept and
incorporate. Nations and cultures as well will see the cogency
of the information and gradually accept it, becoming gradually
more planetary in outlook.
In the name of world unity and peace, governments and
contributing entities should increase funding of the scientific
searches and research in these disciplines and adopt policies that
will release the information, some of it quite certainly withheld
at this time, already possessed.
Contribution: Western Culture Revisited
A major contribution to the resolution of the conflicts
between the religions of Western culture in this regard is the
work of Sir Laurence Gardner. Sitchin’s work and the major discoveries
of the Dead Sea Scrolls, has enabled Gardner, an English genealogist—historian
to make a recent breakthrough. Gardner has the advantage of one hundred
and fifty years of discovery and translation of the Sumerian source
material, knowledge of Anunnaki politics and the interaction of Enki
and Enlil implemented by the latest scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls
and Nag Hamadi documents through the brilliant work of the Australian
theologian, Barbara Thiering . Working as a genealogist with data
available through privileged access to the private archives of thirty
European royal family clients, Gardner has brought to light the fact
that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic
history of a special bloodline carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki
and Sumeria. This information, possessed by the heterodox tradition of
Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer fearful of
the boiling oil of the Inquisition, has always been available. He has
identified the Holy Grail as this bloodline of humans, enhanced by Enki
with additional Anunnaki genes, intended to be human leader-rulers in
a tradition of “servants of the people” traceable all the way back to Sumer.
The modern word Grail traces back to graal, san graal, which, etymologically,
stems from the Sumerian root words GRA AL, meaning special bloodline.
The bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki genes,
initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer through Egypt
to Israel through David and the messiahs (anointed ones), fostered by
the Essene communities as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Jesus was
an Essene in the bloodline as was Mary Magdalene. They were man and wife
and had children. Jesus was of a liberal persuasion within that tradition.
This strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism eventually
became known as heterodox Christian (the word Christian was not coined
until almost four hundred years later) was opposed by the Pauline branch
which eventually allied itself with Rome and became the Roman Church.
The orthodox Roman Church perpetuated the slave-code fear and subservience
tradition and, in its turn, suppressed, persecuted and brutalized the
human centered strain of the bloodline. The reason why women have always
been denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline
was dependent on transmission through the women of the line and any
recognition of them would be recognition of the line. This is a further
elucidation of our genetic background. It is manifestly unjust that
the geneticist is deprived of this vital block of information about the
genome due to the preclusive attitude of the “bishops” still reigning
in archaeology. We are the product of that Nefilim technology, a mutant
species with bicameral genetics, bicameral mind. We can finally integrate
both halves of our nature. Our Homo Erectus component will bring us back
to harmony with this planet, making it a nice place to live and a nice
place to visit. Our Anunnaki component will teach us how to move off planet
gracefully. The word from station DNA is these "gods" wear designer genes.